- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Alert Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is one of several articles on non-notable former political parties. This one only contested one election, in 1959, when they recieved 1.9% of the votes. I can't find any significant coverage of them in reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 00:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep but only if someone can dig up more information: The Alert Party also contested the London County Council elections of 1961 and Forrester also stood at the the 1958 LCC elections as a 'Predestination' candidate. Lozleader (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I tried searching newspaper archives, but nothing came up. If they didn't get significant coverage at the time, they're not notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU tp* 21:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Actually, I base this on Lozleader's comments. It was a one-time party. Therefore not notable. Lord Roem (talk) 02:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.