Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Marcoux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Marcoux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable author. WorldCat holdings for her novels ar 56 (Back to Salem) 43 (A matter of degrees) and 48 (Facades). This is about as trivial as it gets for fiction. Lifesigns and Serendipity are not even in WorldCat . The scientific career is utterly trivial:with only a BS, she would have been a lab assistant. The awards are utterly trivial, or only finalists.

It was written by a known promotional editor, now blocked. see BLPN Though i've brought it here instead of just using G11, I have no objection if another admin wants to speedy. DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 06:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 06:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the sources are either not independent of the subject or do not provide significant coverage. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nom. Not a notable author. No important works, achievements, or awards, and sources are insignificant and/or promotional. INeverCry 00:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 03:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above - No evidence of Notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 06:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.