Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliyah Likit (second nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.--Ezeu 20:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject of this article fails to fall under any of the criteria listed in WP:PORN BIO. A previous nomination of this article was met with a no consensus vote. Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 15:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Expand There are about 27000 Ghits. Try to expand first.--Jusjih 15:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:PORN BIO for an explanation as to fallacy of Google hits in this case. B.Wind 19:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: all discussion should be stopped until nomination is complete. Article in question has not been edited in any way since March 7, 2006. No AfD tag has been placed. I'll be glad to remove this line and resume my discussion of this article upon completion of the nominating process. B.Wind 19:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply to note: I've placed the tag. I believe I did this, but apparently the edit did not go through for some reason. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 19:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, sir. Since there is no evidence in the article of the number of movies she made (the eleven listed is roughly one-ninth the number needed for inclusion in WP:PORN BIO) or awards or anything else mentioned by the proposed threshhold, delete. B.Wind 19:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:PORN BIO. AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. GentlemanGhost 07:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable enough in her field to justify an encyclopedia article. Zaxem 01:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand as per the comments made by Capitalistroadster in the original nomination. Silensor 06:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, the Google hits referred to by Capitalistroadster seem to be limited to picture galleries, rather than actual articles on the person. Please, prove me wrong - if there are actual articles from known sources that could be a reason to keep. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google hits aren't enough for porn topics, and 27000 hits is nothing spectacular anyway. I have 15,500 google hits currently, and I didn't even have to take off my clothes. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.