- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 11:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- All Access Pass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable program. No hits on Google Books or News. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete After some searches, including Google, the only source found was the Facebook page of the same name. Which by the way is either where this article was directly copied from or the article was directly copied to Facebook. Also more than enough time has been given for the article to have been expanded but yet no improvement. Does not meet source, notability and a number of other standards. Pudge MclameO (talk) 04:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ℥nding·start 14:54, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.