Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Envy Aside

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All Envy Aside

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that the ymeet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Sending WP:APPNOTE to Interlaker and Ioannes Pragensis. Boleyn (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral because the only coverage they got was for the 2006 MTVu and such which is acceptable and the article's state is somewhat acceptable as well; with the best my searches finding this (from 2006 for MTVu exactly) and nothing else which leads me to consider delete. SwisterTwister talk 18:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I second Boleyn's comments. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.