- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --Stephen 02:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- All Idols Fall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete explicitly failsWP:MUSIC. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have been a bit busy of late to tidy it up, but I believe that they are a notable new band. Making a big impact, quickly gaining media attention and impressing crowds on a big tour. They are currently writing new material but shortly taking a break whilst supporting Anti Flag a long standing band. I haven't had time to read the notability guidelines yet. But I may get round to it soon. If the article just needs more references and a bit more info I can do that. If it is purely notability which is the problem, these small UK punk rock bands do not often have a full website with any information, often relying on myspace. I feel that for these bands wikipedia often allows a concise article to be written drawing from the various interviews and other information on the internet. So, wikipedia article often shows highly in search rankings for these bands, giving a nice base for information on these bands.
I doubt anyone else will edit this article, so if any changes are needed or new information added I'll have to do it at some point. So lastly is their any information not included that would allows this article to remain or is it purely since the band are so small? Lastsal (talk) 14:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Fails WP:MUSIC. Comment on: "wikipedia often allows a concise article to be written drawing from the various interviews and other information on the internet. So, wikipedia article often shows highly in search rankings for these bands, giving a nice base for information on these bands." Please read WP:NOT. Rigby27 Talk 14:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Delete per nom. Non-notable band. Fails WP:MUSIC. Dgf32 (talk) 00:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.