- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 22:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All Works Out (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. Notability not asserted. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. Description of the EP's recording and release would be better off in the artist's biography page. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 09:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I understand the deletion request for this EP, but certainly the rest of Garage Voice's albums are notable? The band itself is very notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by 30daysinAK (talk • contribs) 03:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:51, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage found.--Michig (talk) 08:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NALBUM. Quote: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." The information about the printing/production history of the album and its significance in the band's history arguably lifts it over the "little more than a track listing" clause. However searches fail to return reliable results even testifying to this album's existence, let alone notability, and so the extreme lack of sources in this case would rebut the presumption of notability and fail the general notability guidelines at WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to a lack of significant coverage to establish N. JBsupreme (talk) 08:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.