Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allip

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Allip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article about little-known Dungoens & Dragons monster. Fails WP:GNG, not mentioned in any independent sources. Not a very active user (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition monsters#TSR 11552 – Monster Manual (2000) for all the reasons listed at WP:ATD. In all cases where you're dealing with something like this, i.e. that doesn't have independent sources but is a plausible search term, please use redirection rather than AfD.—S Marshall T/C 11:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that the proposed target for the merge, List of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition monsters, is also currently in AfD. Not a very active user (talk) 08:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Minor D&D creature with no non-primary sources demonstrating any sort of real world notability. I can not endorse a Redirect/Merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition monsters as suggested as a WP:ATD, since that target article is not something that I think should be in the encyclopedia either - its nothing but a badly sourced list of table of contents of various 3rd Edition books. Rorshacma (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per Rorshacma. Non-notable, and the proposed target is unencyclopedic._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Rorschacma and WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 22:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.