Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Cookson Electronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cookson Group. JForget 00:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Cookson Electronics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Third creation of this article. Twice CSD'd for G11. Initial user blocked indefinitely for a username violation. Article has WP:COI issues. No reliable sources listed - all are either self-published or do not establish notability. Violation of WP:SPAM. GregJackP (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands. A heck of a lot of irrelevant referencing for the London Stock Exchange, and the rest seem to be company based. There might be notability in this outfit, but the article doesn't show it. Wikipedia is not a directory. Peridon (talk) 19:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Awful rubbish. allegedly turnover millions a year and yet the article looks like it has been written by a very young person. Off2riorob (talk) 23:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cookson Group, the parent company -- Whpq (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the parent company per Whpq. Possibly notable, but now owned by another business and can be covered there. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.