Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Man (computer game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. The delete comments make some points, but IMO anyone who wants Alphaman deleted should nominate it and we can have a fresh debate, starting with a more complete article. Mango juice^talk 15:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Man (computer game)

There are several MS-DOS games named Alpha Man that are arguably notable, and this one is none of them. My best guess is that it's yet another Young Zaphod/Doctor Octagon/Herb Gilliland vanity article. If you polled every roguelike expert on Wikipedia -- save YZ -- I predict that none of them would ever have heard of this. Nandesuka 22:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; no hope of expansion if it's none of the known MS-DOS games. Danny Lilithborne 00:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your sources for it being 'not known' Herbert Elwood Gilliland III 19:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this is my favorite MS-DOS game. Herbert Elwood Gilliland III 18:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I contest User:Nandesuka's use of the word WP:Vanity here, as it is not a game I wrote just played. Also, I don't think Nandesuka is being fair or at all considerate. Herbert Elwood Gilliland III 19:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 02:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Vossanova. --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 23:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SOFTWARE Ehheh 14:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Alphaman, which appears to be the same game and has been up for over a year now. --Vossanova ^o< 15:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.