- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 07:44, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Alpha Sigma Pi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable organization WuhWuzDat 15:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Notable organization. My rationale is no more half-assed than this cut-and-paste nomination, which smacks of bad faith and a lack of any research whatsoever. Carrite (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because this article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. NYCRuss ☎ 18:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Per the discussion at ANI on the "Bizarre AFDs" by this editor, I urge a SPEEDY PROCEDURAL CLOSE of this and all other clearly bad-faith, automated ALPHA-BLANK-BLANK challenges, without prejudice to the opening of a new AfD debate on the limited number of pages which may well not meet Wikipedia's inclusion standards. Carrite (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unencyclopedic puffery that very thinly is sourced. Hasteur (talk) 18:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Single-chapter local sorority. Google search finds that the name is not unique; there have been and are several fraternities and professional organizations by the same name, all of which seem to be more notable than this one. --MelanieN (talk) 02:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fraternities with only one chapter in a single college, are almost never notable, & there's nothing to show that this one might be. True,this AfD is the product of a recklessly indiscriminate nomination--but by pure accident, a few of the nominated articles are indeed appropriate for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.