Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Theta Sigma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 03:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Theta Sigma

Repeatedly created page about a fraternity with a rather weak assertion of notability. Delete unless someone can attest to the subject's actual notability. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looked over the article and did a search on Google; couldn't really find any established notability. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 17:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing to show why this is notable, and the creator identifies himself by name on his userpage, then names himself as one of the founders of the fraternity. WP:COI and WP:PROMOTION. The fact this article has been speedy deleted and recreated six times in the last year[1] implies that consensus is that this group is not notable. --Terrillja _talk 18:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Local chapters of fraternaties are unlikely to be notable, but I beg to differ with your assessment specifically. COI and PROMOTION are not a valid reason for deletion if it can be edited and six speedy deletions merely means a couple of administrator's agree on the notability. That's not a concensus. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:ORG and in any case I consider most all frats to be non-notable. Stifle (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, find me a notable frat and I might vote keep, but this one isn't it. Tavix (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.