Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Two-Face

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative versions of Two-Face (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG and WP:BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV. Article itself is mostly (all) WP:OR based on primary sources.   // Timothy :: talk  13:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  13:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Unnecessary article split that fails to justify its existence through reliable sources. It's a plot summary-only mess that belongs on Fandom. TTN (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - None of the individual entries are particularly notable on their own, and I am not finding anything discussing the overall concept of Two-Face's alternate universe versions that would make this a valid independent list article. A short summary could be added to the main Two-Face article, but as most (if not all) of these examples appeared only in a single story, I'm not even sure which ones would even merit a mention there. Rorshacma (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.