Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin and the Chipmunks Deux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete:unsourced. Rodhullandemu (Talk) 01:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin and the Chipmunks Deux

Apparent hoax, as this film title is not mentioned on imdb.com or anywhere else other than sites derived from the Wikipedia article DAJF (talk) 00:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —DAJF (talk) 00:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~hoaxalicious.~~ It's talked about a lot on Google, but there doesn't seem to be any sources that actually confirm it's happening. JuJube (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~G3 as obvious hoax, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)~~ Strong delete unsourced and unverifiable, crystalball. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Crystal ball, unsourced, unverifieable, delete for sure. Some people are even saying that it will happen because it's written here! Soxred93 | talk bot 03:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V and WP:NFF. Also, I slowed the article down to 33⅓RPM and it's actually just a normal human voice! --Dhartung | Talk 04:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only problem is, now Dave sounds like Richard Sterban on Quaaludes. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 05:55, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probable hoax; at least WP:CRYSTAL. Echo the sentiments of Soxred93- citations of Wikipedia as confirmation of this movie are spreading like a rash, as I found doing a google test. Yikes! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 07:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - suffers from WP:NFF and WP:V, as well as a dose of WP:CRYSTAL and, potentially, a case of WP:HOAX. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 14:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Everything has been said above.--Berig (talk) 15:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete given the comments written above, it is our solemn duty to make sure that ANYTHING increasing the chance that there is a sequel to that movie get nuked from orbit. :P Protonk (talk) 16:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:CRYSTAL, no refs, appears to completely OR. Delete. RC-0722 ^247.5/1 16:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That whirring sound is Dave Seville spinning in his grave. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.