Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amalgam Digital

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 June 24.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as blatant advertising of the band. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amalgam Digital

This article was deleted via prod back in January. It's back and weaker—there are no sources in this incarnation of the article. Unsourced article that fails to make a clear case for notability under WP:CORP. —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of WP:RS, thus failing WP:CORP. Will re-evaluate if article improved. Erechtheus (talk) 02:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (edit conflict): Written as an advertisement, violates WP:SOAP and WP:NPOV as well as WP:CORP as brought up by the nominator. -- Nomader ^(Talk) 02:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP, WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Blatant violations, see above.--15stamps (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hard delete: blatant advertising, fails notability guidelines and unsourced. Tagged for a G11. Maybe we should salt it. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 08:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.