Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aman Verjee (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was originally nominated for deletion here. Though because it was affected significantly by sockpuppeting (checkuser), I relisted the nomination. WinHunter ^(talk) 12:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC) (original nom statement) not notable, appears to be written by the person himself for vanity purposes Wikiyoman 01:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Editing one book of political essays isn't enough, and the previous NASCAR magazine folded within 6 months in 2004 [1]. Curiously though, I didn't see a namecheck for Verjee's alleged role with that magazine, even in a Stanford piece [2]. --Mereda 16:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. He is just trying to cash in on his Stanford Connection. Seems non-ntable to me. Marwatt 17:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as NN. C56C 01:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I maintain my vote from the previous debate. Not particluarly notable in my view. There are a few references to his having written for the Standford review and his editorship role therein, but not of his chairmanship, not that that is enough to sway my vote. Ohconfucius 05:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.