- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Amazon Eve (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person is allegedly the world's tallest model, presumably defined as somebody willing to have her photo taken for money. I doubt if this can be shown to be demonstrated in reputable sources. Grahame (talk) 06:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Whether or not she is actually the world's tallest model, she does appear to pass WP:GNG via significant coverage in reliable sources.--Michig (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article does not state that she is the world's tallest model, although other sources make that claim. What the article does say is that she appeared on the cover of the Australian edition of Zoo Weekly, and that fact (together with photos) has been widely reported. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- An unfortunate keep. Sadly, this kind of thing is considered "notable" under the current criteria. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Since several sources state that she is the "worlds tallest model" I added this to the article, in the form that such claims have been published, not that they are accurate. Most models have published height stats, one could I suppose review those to check, but could never prove complete coverage. But it is an undeniable fact that this person has been so described in multiple published news stories. The matter may not be of great importance, but it has had significant coverage. DES (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Many models have Wikipedia pages and this particular one appears to be notable now as being the world's tallest, or at least one of the tallest. Interest may wane in her and her modeling career in the future and certainly deletion might be reasonable then, especially if the article is still not expanded with additional information such as her real name. AlanSiegrist (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.