Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amentini Motors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amentini Motors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still nothing at all actually convincing and substantial despite DGG's PROD removed, it only lasted a limited amount of time, and contributing to the fact it was a local business, there's nothing at all actually suggestive for better. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g. [1]). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a non-notable dealership. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems to try to inherit notability from franchisor, Tucker, but notability is not inherited.--Rpclod (talk) 08:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Northamerica1000. Can't find much out of this company. —MRD2014 T C 17:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.