Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America can't do a damn thing against us

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

America can't do a damn thing against us

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. Sourcing points to the fact that this is WP:OR, as Iranian Mullahs (Ayatollahs) and politicians are prone to use the phrase "can't do a damn about us" with US, Obama etc. So it's just a phrase used in political rhetoric , does not warrant a place in wikipedia. Elektricity (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FreeatlastChitchat.[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It simply passes the GNG. See [1] and [2] for example, let alone Farsi sources. --Mhhossein ^talk 19:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: On 25 February 2016 this article is shown at wp:DYK part of main page. According to DYKrule, all of paragraphs in the article must have Inline citation. In any case, America can't do a damn thing against us is supported by relaible sources such as 1 and 2. Regards! Saff V. (talk) 06:32, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 08:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It passes GNG based on the citations, in particular the "Foreign Policy" article. However, the article name is inappropriate as a description and should perhaps be something like "America can't do a damn thing against us (Iranian slogan)" Fiachra10003 (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - citations very clearly establish that this article passes GNG, and should therefore remain. Would not oppose a page move to a new title, however. Stormy clouds (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.