Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amiga Games Database

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus -- Samir धर्म 05:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable website Barrylb 02:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:WEB. Alexa ranking of 1803 [1]--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 02:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable. --Starionwolf 04:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Borderline speedy-A7? Paddles ^T_C 08:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, this is a famous site for game reviews, even if isn't updated very often. JIP | Talk 12:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per nom. Also advertisement. Tychocat 10:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I think this website is notable. I would think an Alexa ranking of 1803 is quite high, most of the websites that have been deleted per AfD have had rankings in the ten-thousands, if not even lower, or none at all. This website was one of the primary sources for List of Amiga games (see its talk page) and serves as a good resource for Amiga game reviews. And about the claims in the article that are seen as advertising, they are there to assert notability. JIP | Talk 12:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per JIP. Green451 03:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.