Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amiga Internet and communications software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Amiga software. j⚛e deckertalk 16:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Amiga Internet and communications software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a directory. The "Communication Protocols" section could potentially be merged into Amiga software. James086Talk 17:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge back into Amiga software. I love the Amiga, but this much detail is unnecessary, considering the Amiga has been a niche market at best for the last decade and a half. JIP | Talk 21:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 06:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 18:56, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 04:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree, merge into Amiga software, probably can not survive as a separate article.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.