- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Amiga enforcer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software debugging utility, for which I can't find signs of significant coverage among the 53 unique Google hits or elsewhere. PROD contested with the comment that "It is well known within the Amiga programming community. It was distributed on Fred Fish's software collection disks," apparently on disk #454 out of 1120. However, neither of these claims establishes notability within the guidelines. Glenfarclas (talk) 22:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue that being included on the Fish disks counts as presumed notability within the guidellines. The fish disks reads like a who's who of Amiga PD software. --Magin846 (talk) 08:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'd be happier if there was something to merge this into, perhaps a list of Amiga PD software of some kind, but as it stands there's no reason why any encyclopedia would have a stand-alone article on this relatively obscure piece of public ___domain software, and the sources aren't there to support it. Fails WP:GNG. -- Ϫ 09:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.