- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BIO not notable no wikilinks and no information to indicate importance of subject or the organisation to which subject belongs Ohconfucius 06:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Michael 08:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The site http://www.hinduunity.org/ is a controversial one, suggesting that the group's leader may be noteworthy. See http://us.rediff.com/news/2004/may/26hindu.htm Mumbai police gag hinduunity.org It could be argued that the term pro-Hindu in the article should be changed to anti-Moslem. That being said, I would be reluctant to write an article about the Hindu Unity group because I am afraid that the article would fall victim to POV wars and that the group's supporters (or perhaps its opponents) would try to get the article deleted. In short: obscure but not unimportant. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 09:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Such an article was already written, and it has already been through AfD twice (2nd round). Amit Godbole can be merged there if it survives AfD. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 13:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - Current status of the article provides no information. Hindu Unity is at AfD too. My take would be to merge this one-liner article into Hindu Unity (if it survives AfD) and delete Amit Godbole with a hope that a red link would motivate some person to write a better article. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 14:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom, not even his group seems notable... hard to get any outside info on them. --Svartalf 17:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Steve Hart 23:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.