Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrut Deshmukh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The creator of this article, Riddhi1981, is confirmed by a checkuser to be a sockpuppet of OfficialPankajPatidar. MER-C 08:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amrut Deshmukh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG no independent coverage in reliable sources to support notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Amrut Deshmukh is a notable entity as he has tried to start up a mission for Youth to cultivate reading. He has been mentioned by Notable sites Rediff/ Bayside Journal for this initiative. Would be appreciated if his Wikipedia is accepted. As he is trying to initiate a noble cause Kindly let me know, what else notable events needs to be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riddhi1981 (talk • contribs)

@Riddhi1981: Wikipedia's notability standards have nothing to do with whether the subject is "trying to initiate a noble cause" or not. Coverage by Rediff may perhaps contribute to evidence of notability, but purely local coverage, as for example in the Bayside Journal, is very weak evidence. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)

Delete lack of sufficient coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearcut advertising alone. SwisterTwister talk 21:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.