Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Untitled Story: Extension Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- An Untitled Story: Extension Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Incomprehensible (in its current revision bordering on word salad), gossipy, and no obvious notability. Pseudomonas(talk) 21:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note – I reverted to the cleanest version of the article here. MuZemike 22:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete – complete lack of verifiability. Absolutely nothing in reliable secondary sources. I cannot tell if this is madeup or an attempt at humor. MuZemike 22:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Muzemike and Pseudomonas are right. Hard to tell even exactly what it is; if it is an attempt at humor it's failing. The sooner this is gone the better. Drmies (talk) 03:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Delete. A mess of an article that has no real content, and has no proven significance. It only refers to 2 forum topics, no solid third-party resource, i.e. what MuZemike already described. Suggestion: Merge with An Untitled Story, i.e. expand the section there and trash this article. <3 bunny 06:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per verifiability policy and notability guidelines. Note that I am also creating an AfD An Untitled Story. Marasmusine (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If for no other reason, Just because I feel dumber having read it. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.