Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analytica (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Has been expanded with what is probably an excessive number of references in an attempt to establish notability. There have been no comments thereafter, so I'm closing this as no consensus for now.  Sandstein  05:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Analytica (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable. Google search failed to provide non-trivial, reliable, third-party sources. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 17:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - lacks significant coverage; article has no 3rd party refs to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Relisting comment. I originally closed this as "delete" back in April but I'm restoring and relisting the article for further comment per a request by email. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Author's Response: I have made modifications to the article to address the concerns that have been voiced. I'd like to see the up-for-deletion status removed soon. Please post additional concerns and let's get it done. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldc (talk • contribs) 20:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.