Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analytical sciences digital library
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. No prejudice against a future merge, that is a non-AfD related process in this case that does not need an admin, but would perhaps need further consensus. See WP:MERGE for assistance. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Analytical sciences digital library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unsourced, and does not assert notability -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 11:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually it isn't unsourced (there are several inline external links) and the notability is implied by the US national level of the enterprise and the cataloguing mentioned. However, I think merge with National Science Digital Library is likely to be the best move. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep significant American Chemical Society and NSF joint project. There will undoubtedly be references in the chemical and library literature to it. DGG (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per DGG. John254 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per DGG; I see no good argument to delete here. Merging is okay with me, but I don't like AFD to be the way that gets decided. Mangojuicetalk 16:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.