Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Kumar Ojha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anant Kumar Ojha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG. I attempted to find additional sources and had trouble finding any that seemed reliable. I do not know how noteworthy being the MLA of the Rajmanhal constituency of Jharkhand is, but this page either needs major expansion with additional reliable sources. or needs to be deleted. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 18:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. BlackJackPlayer (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obviously passes WP:POLITICIAN. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable politician. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 19:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't accept the WP:POLITICIAN guideline? That has been one of the few guidelines that has been accepted almost without question almost since Wikipedia started, so you really need to explain better why we should make an exception in this case. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep as for MLA is satisfying WP:POLITICIAN, enough said. SwisterTwister talk 19:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per above: Not a reason for deletion for a person who passes GNG. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 19:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Subject is the current Member of Legislative Assembly of Jharkhand, passes WP:POLITICIAN. Pratyush (talk) 07:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.