Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchor Point Public Library (Second nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect; merge has been performed. Sr13 is almost Singularity 04:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Anchor Point Public Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Has previously been listed on AFD, without consensus to delete - having 12600 books doesn't make it notable IMHO, and there's nothing claimed here to make this library more special - maybe merging into Anchor Point is the best bet. The previous AFD debate is found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchor Point Public Library . Apologigies if I didn't list this AFD correctly --Moglex 13:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Anchor Point, Alaska per suggestions in previous AFD. JulesH 14:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Anchor Point, Alaska, per above. A tiny library in a tiny town fails WP:ORG going away. Ravenswing 15:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. James Luftan contribs 16:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Anchor Point article. Realkyhick 17:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No real info to merge. -R. fiend 17:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- to make it all nice and simple, I've merged as originally suggested. I'd suggest somebody WP:SNOWs this debate and turns the article to a redirect. JulesH 18:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. As it probably notable locally, I don't think a local library unless significantly historical deserve an article and especially due to the low content on this article which looks like similar then your typical local library.--JForget 00:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Anchor Point, Alaska as per the above. This action does not require a deletion debate. Burntsauce 17:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.