Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancillary weapon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ancillary weapon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:DICDEF with no evidence it passes notability criteria. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Technology. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG. Does not warrant a stand alone article for explanation of a phrase (WP:NOT and WP:NOTDICTIONARY). QEnigma (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - The term is well accepted and frequently used. But it doesn't need an article. A dictionary definition is enough. Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per White Christmas. Bearian (talk) 05:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. Fails GNG. Garuda Talk! 17:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.