Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Thomas (composer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, bad faith AFD started by sockpuppet of banned user. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Thomas (composer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has received no significant awards for his "work," and neither has he been written about in reputable publications. There is a reason this article has no sources--its because no sources exist. Don't let his being a classical composer blind you to the reality that this man is not-notable. This article demonstrates that the subject's level of achievement and recognition is that of your average "Myspace" garage band. Politoman (talk) 05:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This AfD will have to await input from musicians, but I find the offensive tone of the nomination to be inconsistent with Wikipedia's standards. The nominator started editing on WP two days ago. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.