Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Croft (actor)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Andy Croft (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Minor actor lacking significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This article includes numerous embedded refs that link to sources that do not mention the subject. Bit parts include roles as Hunter, Soldier, Fan, Student, Thug, etc. Fails WP:NACTOR. 1. Has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. 2. Does not have a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. 3. Has not made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Cindamuse (talk) 22:17, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone can convincingly argue why the roles he acted in were significant. They look like cameos to me. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination, I think this actor [1] falls a little short of WP:NACTOR. bobrayner (talk) 02:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.