- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Angad chahal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability asserted, but fails notability criteria for athletes as he has only competed in local youth leagues; never in a national-level or professional competition. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per WP:ONEEVENT. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:ATHLETE. Joe Chill (talk) 00:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't come close to WP:CRIN / WP:ATH. I'm not sure that importance is asserted as district level is not two levels below professional. -SpacemanSpiff 07:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't adhere to the criterias' of WP:CRIN and WP:ATH. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While I see some sources that show a level of notability, there aren't any (that I see in an admittedly brief search at Google) that talk about Chahal himself - they refer to the results of a match or to the team. Surely, Chahal's career will bring him enough notability for an article - but it doesn't look like he's there quite yet. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 17:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.