- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The subject does not meet the notability guidelines for creative professionals and a lack of reliable sources means that she does not meet the primary notability criterion either. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Angel Favazza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I cannot see evidence to support notability, per WP:CREATIVE or WP:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria. Note, I have removed a large number of external links, see diff. I have searched on Google News (no hits), Google Scholar (no hits), Amazon.com (no hits). The standard Google search only appears to show blog sites etc, I can see no reliable sources there. Chzz ► 18:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:BIO. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 22:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Nanowolf (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – as a non-notable, unsourced BLP. Also reads like promotion, but that's me. MuZemike 18:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.