Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angels and Monsters
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirected to List of Heroes episodes. Stifle (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Angels and Monsters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The sole source of this article is a blog, which in turn uses a single Flickr image (supposedly form the show's creator, but unverifiable) as its source. Verifiable nor reliable whatsoever. — Edokter • Talk • 00:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notice of a future episode is not an encyclopedic topic. Wikipedia is not a program guide. ~ Ningauble (talk) 01:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the main Heroes article as a temporary measure. Article can always be recreated when the episode title is confirmed. 23skidoo (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect to List of Heroes episodes#Season 3: 2008–2009, same rationale as 23skidoo. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Although it doesn't fit in with the rules, there's not really any point in deleting it now as the season will start soon so it will only be gone for a few weeks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.201.63 (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The point is we don't know that; the title is likely completely bogus. So the article should not be created until it can be verified as true. That is why we have the rules. — Edokter • Talk • 23:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.