Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angie Morrill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Angie Morrill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Angie Morrill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. 🄻🄰 16:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Oregon. 🄻🄰 16:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. There is one paper that is highly cited. The citations fall off very steeply after that, and if the paper were a book, then I would suggest a redirect as an WP:ATD (but I don't think a stub on the paper is a great idea). Comment that the paper is coauthored with a higher profile academic, Eve Tuck. WP:NPROF notability for a 2016 PhD and current instructor would be a bit surprising anyway. No other notability is apparent. Watching discussion in case someone uncovers better evidence of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Citation count isn't high enough for me, and likely a case of WP:TOO SOON. Also, while this isn't strictly to do with the notability criteria, the promotional nature of the article is very off-putting and pushes me further away from a keep. Leonstojka (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.