- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Hermione1980 23:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be a made-up word. --Mysidia (talk) 02:18, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination Paul Cyr 02:28, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Never heard of it, although it could be used to partially describe me. Depends on how insulting you want to be. Saberwyn 02:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism. freshgavinΓΛĿЌ 05:05, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously. JPD (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as part of the "War on Portmanteaux" --MacRusgail 09:58, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Me or a Robin 10:58, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sounds like a corruption of Anglo-Australian, but what self-respecting Aussie would want to live the English culture? Even Barry Tuckwell went back Down Under when he retired :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? 10:35, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. Alphax τεχ 06:21, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Capitalistroadster 06:48, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.