- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, although now I'm imagining enraged otters taking over the US Congress. DS 00:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits] Protologism. No evidence this is widely used. --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:NEO. Only one Google result, which doesn't even seem to be relevant. Possibly falls under CSD A1.--TBCTaLk?!? 05:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per above. Erechtheus 07:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I get a couple hundred GHits (including stuff like this - see fourth bullet), but nothing relevant. Even if it were referenced, though, this still wouldn't be a notable neologism. Every game has its jargon, and most of it isn't worth cataloguing. Zetawoof(ζ) 08:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Nigel (Talk) 12:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete: not even a neologism. sigh. --Storkk 13:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. Thε Halo Θ 14:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Arbusto 22:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.