- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Angus Kirkby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears non-notable. Only source I could find was this, but it doesn't vouch for any claims in the article. ~DC Talk To Me 00:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources for his appearance in cited theatre productions and films. This was the sole edit by Anguskirkby (talk · contribs). Possible hoax? --Vejvančický (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of third-party coverage giving evidence of significant roles on the young actor. The Monkey King is a notable character in a classical Chinese epic novel, which has had many stage or literary adaptations. He may well've been in one, but there's no indication it was a significant production, like this one. He appears to've had a role in a short film some years back, followed with a few understudy or extra parts, then the role as the young monkey king a few years ago; nothing since then. –Whitehorse1 22:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - one Google news hit, from the BBC, where he briefly records his experiences meeting a few Olympians. This doesn't go at all towards verifying his claim to notability as an actor, and doesn't qualify as significant coverage either, thus he does not seem to pass WP:ENT. Cocytus [»talk«] 17:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.