Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 22:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources for this book. Schuym1 (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak
DeleteKeep I can't find professional reviews either in Google. However, it meets some threshold standards as it is sold in online stores and is included in some university libraries.--Lenticel (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing per Eastmain. I can't access (it seems they're only accessible in the US) the reviews but I'll AGF. Can you add inline cites or excerpts from the reviews?--Lenticel (talk) 02:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I added excerpts from the two reviews. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing per Eastmain. I can't access (it seems they're only accessible in the US) the reviews but I'll AGF. Can you add inline cites or excerpts from the reviews?--Lenticel (talk) 02:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I found professional reviews at School Library Journal and Booklist. --Eastmain (talk) 02:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.