Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anime Depression

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anime Depression (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is entirely original research with no bases in reliable sources. A Google search for "Anime Depression" turns up with nothing. See also Naruto: Shippuden on Disney XD Affair for a very similar article which was deleted do to lack of coverage by reliable, third-party sources. Disputed prod. —Farix (t | c) 21:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 21:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 22:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This made me LOL, Anime depression, really? Where was I when this all went down? Anyways delete per Farix WP:OR Galore. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not one item is sourced and searching for sources come up empty. This is just original research. ICYTIGER'SBLOOD 16:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. JJ98 (Talk) 03:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.