- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisment for store of dubious notability. Artw 22:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I love anime, but I can't see one store which has been around since 2004 being encyclopedically notable yet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Steel 22:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unapologetically self-referential:"Our newest features...". "Anime Express has been up and running since December 2004." doubtful it could have become notable in a competetive market in that time. Google agrees with few relevent hits [1]. Pork and Ham canned for freshness. --IslaySolomon 22:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 16:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reads like an advert. --TheFarix (Talk) 16:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it's an advert --Kunzite 17:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 'we' and 'our' are dead giveaways. - Wickning1 15:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.