- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Annabel Simms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was previously deleted by PROD, which was apparently later contested by article subject. Article was undeleted, with advice to article subject that she offer suggestions for sources on talk page. None forthcoming. PROD concern was Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. ClaretAsh (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete couldn't find anything notable on google (plenty of publicity though), and nothing in Daily Telegraph, perhaps her articles there were anonymous or too long ago. Article as currently written is not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiswick Chap (talk • contribs) 16:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Simply writing for a living does not constitute notability. --MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Lots of google hits, but as an author not subject. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.