Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonsid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anonsid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR bio about a hacker that cites no sources (and none seem to be available) and that is either promotional or defamatory depending upon ones point of view. Incidentally, the article should correctly be titled "An0n$iD", although even that does not help find any reliable sources. Abecedare (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think,there is small amount of information available about the defacer.I came to know about the defacer because my name and his name is similar(last part of name).I saw the article on wikia.com .And I came to know that there are many websites,hosting servers defaced by the defacer and also concluded by seeing the cache history of the web domains from google that the defacer has tried to depict some social issues on every deface pages.And sadly his twitter,facebook account links stated in wikia article are not working or maybe deleted by the social networks.Else more information should have been possible to extract from that links.Haxxorsid (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing even approaching a source, the external links do not fill such a need.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 03:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.