[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ansarada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. The sources are not very strong, and the subject’s notability is unclear. The page comes across as promotional for the company. Oftermart (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. Oftermart (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Article is rather promotional and lacking reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 02:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: At least a little more discussion would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:47, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment. Here are some sources with coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. No opinion about whether this is sufficient enough to pass WP:ORGCRIT. It might be. Or it might not. Best.4meter4 (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2025 (UTC)