- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is entirely unreferenced and apparent original research. John254 05:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - The name and its definition shows up on some Indian baby name sites[1], so some references could be added. I think the question at this point is if the name is notable enough to warrant an article. Unless some famous Anshuls can be dragged up, I'm inclined to think that it isn't. -- H·G (words/works) 06:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not Wiktionary. utcursch | talk 11:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per UtcurshDoctor Bruno 03:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.