Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuj Saini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) scope_creep^Talk 12:03, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anuj Saini

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Commercial actor, non notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. 3 of the 5 references are driven by press releases. Brand new actor only 18 months in the job. May be WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep^Talk 21:32, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if it's not violating terms I & my sister were watching ad and she asked me to search for this guy I did and found nothing! so got into digging and for this information on him and as I like creating articles on made for him. rest is upto you. I found no more references on him. Vixhere (talk) 07:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies WP:BIO, WP:NACTOR, etc.--PATH SLOPU 12:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Path slopu: - can NACTOR be passed purely by adverts - obviously there's a goodly number and they're big companies - I'm fairly neutral on the possibility and was interested on expansion Nosebagbear (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Drafts Definitely WP:TOOSOON. Perhaps should be moved to drafts?

Exploreandwrite (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - it's far to soon and he's a classic "up and coming" actor. Bearian (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think i'm going to close this with a keep unless anybody says otherwise and I'll do the cleanup. scope_creep^Talk 20:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.