- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anurudh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:DICDEF - Article does no more than a dictionary does/should. Tavix (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It also lacks the proper context. (At least, I couldn't make heads or tails of it. It's somehow related to Hindy deities, but the creator didn't start with a proper definition, perhaps a merge/redirect is in order? =- Mgm|(talk) 09:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I doubt it as there really is any articles that would accept this kind of information. Tavix (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —J.Mundo (talk) 04:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--dictionary definition of what? Drmies (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. FaerieInGrey (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Never heard of it. May be a typos of Aniruddha, by the context. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.