- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Apache Warrior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film critic. Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Sources about him are not independent since he writes for xcritic and is a voting member of avn. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Apache Warrior is also a voting member for The Tranny Awards and The Galaxy Awards. He is involved with the XBIZ and XRCO Awards. He is the only adult film reviewer who gets to vote in the top three adult film awards (AVN, XRCO, and XBIZ) along in the Tranny and Galaxy Awards. The Galaxy Awards are based in Spain. He also votes in the GFY Awards. Both of those are based overseas. So, Apache Warrior has extensive voting duties globally.
- Thank you for your time and I hope that you keep Apache Warrior's Wikipedia page online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregorioGonuelas (talk • contribs) 03:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: No doubt he is an eminent adult film critic, but the only way for keeping the article is posting reliable secondary sources about him. "Dura Lex, Sed Lex", it happens even for more important mainstream film critics and journalists. Cavarrone (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Actually fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Cavarrone (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Subject fails the GNG and all relevant SNGs. None of the article's sourcing is genuinely independent. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.