Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apogee electronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete G11 by User:Toddst1. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apogee electronics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete: Fails WP:CORP and WP:RS. The claim "leading manufacturer" is unsourced. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as copyvio and spam, just as Apogee Electronics was before. Why are we bothering with an AfD? --Finngall ^talk 19:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G11 and G12. So tagged. —BradV 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete if we're still bothering with an AfD. Copyvio. paranomia (formerly tim.bounceback)^{a door?} 20:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per last 2 votes archanamiya · talk 20:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.